|
Sentencing Guidelines Council under attack
Draft
guidelines
here |
In April
2006 the Sentencing Guidelines Council said that men who used
violence against their partners should be sentenced to rehabilitation
classes or community orders in some circumstances, they said,
"Rather than the imposition of a short custodial sentence, an
appropriate disposal in such situations might be a suspended sentence
order or a community order, in either case with a requirement to
attend a domestic violence programme."
The
Metropolitan Police Authority responded immediately saying:
"The
proposals by the Sentencing Guidelines Council that those responsible
for domestic violence could potentially escape custodial sentences for
their brutality is a retrograde step and the Metropolitan Police
Authority's new Domestic Violence Board questions the logic and justice
behind the suggestion.
"We
just have to look at the facts to see that domestic violence is a
vicious and a repetitive crime. On average a woman is assaulted more
than 30 times before seeking help and even more worrying is the fact
that domestic homicide accounts for over 25% of murders in London.
"Rehabilitation classes or community orders should not be viewed as an
alternative to custodial sentences - complementary perhaps, but the fact
is that the individual responsible for the violence is committing a
criminal act, leaving victims traumatised and vulnerable in their own
homes, and we need to send out a strong message that it is simply
unacceptable."
|
|
Domestic violence |
The extent of the problem of women battered by their
partners was shown by the research of Mooney for
Tolerance against Domestic violence.
-
Only one in three men said they would
never use violence against their partners,
-
23% said they could envisage situations
where they would.
-
One in five said they would react
violently every time to situations such as nagging, or housework not
been done well enough.
-
Nearly 25% of women said their partners
had raped them.
-
10% had suffered an attempted
strangulation.
-
7% had occasioned broken bones.
|
|
The
desire for change continues |
March
2004, the Lord Chancellor, Lord Falconer delivered a speech at the
Barbican Centre outlining proposals for reform.
"There are an estimated 600,000 incidents of domestic violence each
year. But at the same time, it’s estimated that there are only 7,000
criminal prosecutions."
"Other estimates suggest that 95 per cent of victims suffer for more
than 6 months before seeking help and around half suffer for more than 5
years."
"Women on average are attacked 35 times before they seek help against
the perpetrators of domestic violence. And two women are killed every
week in domestic violence incidents."
"And yet only 19,000 victims of domestic violence are seeking
non-molestation orders or occupation orders through the civil courts."
He proposes changes to the law some of which are:
-
improving the law on non-molestation orders
-
sentencing changes including manslaughter by reason of provocation,
particularly in domestic settings
Full
speech here |
|
'The Age of Anxiety' |
On 21 October 1997, Harriet Harman, Social Security
Secretary and Minister for Women spoke at the launch of the National
Children's Home (NCH) Action for Children's report: 'The
Age of Anxiety'.
82% of children are concerned about violence at home
and that crimes against women are more likely to be committed in their
homes by someone they know.
"Tackling violence against women is one of my key
priorities as Minister for Women.”
-
43% of all assaults against women
are within the home by someone they know;
-
41% of all women homicide victims were
killed by their present or former partner;
-
Women suffer twice over - once for
themselves and again for their children - 82% of children fear violence
in the home."
-
Only 10% of men are killed by their
partners.
|
|
British Crime Survey
(BCS) 2005/6 |
Usually a more reliable figure
shows unreported domestic violence.
The latest BCS
results suggests that the
number of violent crimes remains stable - July 2006.
As well as violence within
heterosexual couples, there is an increasing awareness of violence in
other kinds of relationship (for example, same sex couples, or abuse of
elderly parents by their adult children).
Survey here |
|
Victims of domestic assaults rarely
receive the law's protection |
|
Not reported |
Few domestic assaults (around 2%) are reported to the
police. If they are not reported, obviously they cannot be prosecuted, and
the violent partner escapes punishment.
|
|
Because….
-
Embarrassment
-
Own fault
-
Hoped to be single episode
-
BWS
-
Fear that reporting the offence will
simply lead to further beatings
|
-
Embarrassment; what the violence says
about their relationship
-
Blame themselves; violent partners claim
they have been provoked into violence by the woman's behaviour.
-
Tells herself that it will not happen
again; she may feel powerless and unable to escape or take any steps
towards report in the offence.
-
This situation can lead to a psychological
state, called a battered woman syndrome (now taken into account in the
defence of provocation and diminished responsibility).
-
If the police charge the partner, the
partner will usually be granted bail, and is highly likely to arrive
home and attack again in revenge for making the complaint.
|
|
No evidence of improvement |
Metropolitan Police figures show that domestic
violence has levelled at 44,342 in 2002.
This could mean that there was no decrease in
domestic violence, but it could equally suggest a change in reporting to
the police.
|
|
The traditional police approach to domestic violence |
-
Avoid involvement; leave the partners to
sort things out themselves.
-
Respect privacy of the home and the family
which has been a traditional part of British culture “an Englishman's
home is his castle”.
-
Intervention of the legal system might
need to increased marriage breakdown.
-
A couple might divorce if a prosecution,
but left alone, they would patch up their differences.
-
Where prosecutions are bought, by the time
the case comes to court wives and girlfriends refuse to give evidence,
leading to cases collapsing.
|
|
Attempts to improve the lot of women |
A spouse can now be compelled to give evidence
against their partner in court proceedings,
Section 80 Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984.
Extensive improvements in civil orders of restraint
(with powers of police arrest attached) orders can be made prohibiting
contact and even ousting the violent person from the home. The
effect of such an order in practice is minimal if the violent partner is
determined to get to the victim.
|
|
Home Office guidelines, the police to treat
domestic violence in the same way as stranger violence |
In 1990, the Home Office published guidelines to
encourage the police to take domestic violence seriously.
These stress the importance of keeping careful
records of incidence of domestic violence and registers of people at risk
similar to those kept for children at risk.
They also encourage prosecution rather than attempts
at reconciliation in appropriate cases.
|
|
Stalking |
Describes a campaign of harassment. Such conduct
raises two important questions:
|
|
Protection
from Harassment Act 1997 |
Allows for civil action and creates several new
criminal offences.
Section 1 prohibits a person from pursuing a course
of conduct that they know or ought to know amounts to harassment of
another punishable by six months' imprisonment.
Section 4 creates aggravated harassment where, in
addition, the defendant knows or ought to know that they placed the victim
in fear of violence on at least two occasions. Carries five years'
imprisonment.
|
|
Was it necessary? |
Was it a knee-jerk reaction? Some have
suggested that it was. The same argument applies to other
legislation such as changes to the law on joyriding and dangerous dogs.
They all address a narrow social harm backed by a single issue pressure
group campaign, with widely drawn provisions which overlap existing
offences.
The new offences in the 1997 Act are broadly defined
and they have impinged upon other activities hitherto regarded as
legitimate, such as investigative journalism. When it introduced the Act
the Government estimated that there would only be 200 extra prosecutions
per year. But the latest Home Office figures show more than 6,000
cases a year.
The Act has also been used in cases having nothing
whatsoever to do with stalking and involving former partners,
demonstrators and newspapers.
The Sun was successfully sued under the
Protection
from Harassment Act over articles it published (Thomas
v News Group Newspapers, Times Law Report July 25, 2001) and,
regardless of the rights or wrongs of that particular case, it is
certainly a far cry from the original motivation and justification behind
the
Protection from Harassment Act.
|
|
The Common Law could accommodate social
change |
Cases such as
R v Ireland and Burstow and
R v Constanza show that the courts were prepared to adapt existing
criminal law offences to include this type of harmful conduct. On the
other hand, some people feel that these cases artificially distorted the
existing law ignoring accepted authorities and that a fresh legislative
approach was required with this specific problem in mind.
In practice the value of the 1997 Act may be that it
includes a power to make restraining orders forbidding the defendant from
pursuing any conduct which amounts to harassment and a power of arrest to
enforce these orders.
|
|
Speech
by Dame Butler-Sloss |
here |
|
Domestic violence data source |
here |