|
Ministerial Orders |
|
Regulatory Reform Orders
|
Repeal
of primary legislation by Order. |
|
Statutory Instruments (SIs) ... can amend primary legislation (Acts of
Parliament) |
Ministers make
statutory Instruments under the authority of an enabling Act.
-
Some
statutes have 'Henry VIII clauses', which allow primary legislation to
be amended or repealed by secondary legislation without parliamentary
scrutiny; e.g. The Criminal Justice Bill 1990, which allowed criminal
offences to be added or removed by instrument. Other Henry VIII bills
include the Child Support (1991), and Education (Student Loans) (1990)
Bills.
|
|
Henry VIII Clauses |
"… a provision in a
bill which enables primary legislation to be amended or repealed by
subordinate legislation with or without further Parliamentary scrutiny"
The clauses were so named from the
Statute of Proclamations 1539, which gave King Henry VIII power to
legislate by proclamation. |
|
Formerly called
Deregulation and Contracting Out Act 1994
and Henry VIII Clause |
The
Regulatory
Reform Act 2001 enables the Government to make an Order to amend or
repeal a provision in primary legislation which is considered to impose a
burden on business or others, as long as it can be reduced or removed
without removing necessary protection.
This Act extended the provisions of the
Deregulation and Contracting Out Act 1994 under which the orders were
known as 'deregulation orders'.
Repealed by the
Legislative and Regulatory Reform Act 2006 |
|
Legislative and Regulatory Reform Act 2006 |
The
Legislative and Regulatory Reform Act 2006 from 8 January 2007
gave ministers new powers to strip away red tape.
The Act is seen as the way forward to fight bureaucracy. Although there
are provisions that will ensure Parliament can block controversial
decisions it has been dubbed “The Destruction of Parliament Act”, because
the provisions allow ministers to avoid the full process needed for a full
Act but to achieve the same result.
The effect of the Act will be to create a new form of Delegated
Legislation which empowers a minister to make an order to improve
business, including creation or removal of a criminal sanction from almost
any other legislative form from byelaws to Acts of Parliament themselves.
Orders will be created by Statutory Instrument made by:
(i) the negative resolution procedure;
(ii) the affirmative resolution procedure; or
(iii) the super-affirmative resolution procedure
(this new procedure allows material changes to the order if made within 60
days)
The super-affirmative resolution procedure changes the rule that Statutory
Instruments cannot be amended following being laid before Parliament.
This Act is now the procedure for implementing EU Obligations.
|
|
Controls of Ministerial
Orders |
|
Concern that Ministerial Orders were too powerful |
Parliament's examination of deregulation proposals and draft orders was
introduced in response to concern that the sweeping powers given to
Ministers to make Ministerial Orders under primary legislation should be
properly accountable. |
|
Complex and thorough procedure |
During a period of 60 days, select committees in both Houses scrutinise
the proposal.
|
|
The Commons: Regulatory Reform Committee |
In the Commons, the Committee which consists of eighteen members must
examine each proposal against fourteen criteria.
These include:
-
the maintenance of "necessary protection"
for those who may be affected,
-
the adequacy of public consultation,
-
the extent of the burden to be lifted,
-
financial implications and
-
compliance with European law.
|
|
The House of
Lords: Select Committee on Delegated Powers and Regulatory Reform
(“the Jellicoe
Committee”) |
In 1992 there was growing disquiet
“over the problem of wide and sometimes ill-defined
order-making powers which give ministers unlimited discretion”
which lead to what is now called the Select Committee on Delegated
Powers and Regulatory Reform Committee is appointed by the House of Lords in each session to
report on:
-
any inappropriately delegate legislative
power,
-
inappropriate level of parliamentary
scrutiny;
-
orders under the
Regulatory
Reform Act 2001, and the functions performed in respect of other
instruments by the Joint Committee on Statutory Instruments.
|
|
The draft Orders are subject to a thorough and complex procedure |
When they are approved by both Houses, they are made by the Minister
responsible and are then printed and published as Statutory Instruments by
the Stationery Office. |
|
Remedial Orders
under the Human Rights Act 1998 |
|
The procedure followed is similar to that for regulatory reform orders |
If a court makes a declaration of incompatibility with the
European Convention on Human Rights in relation to a statute, the
Government is able to propose draft Orders or make Orders to amend primary
legislation in order to remove any incompatibility.
An example of a remedial order is given
here.
It corrects an unfairness in Courts Martial where the Judge Advocate of a
Naval Court Martial was appointed by Naval officers (unlike the Army and
the Air Force), this lead to an appeal to the UCtHR -
Grieves v United
Kingdom [2003] ECtHR - which declared that such a Naval tribunal was not 'independent'
as required by Article 6 of the Convention.
The Remedial Order provides that Judge Advocate of Her Majesty's Fleet, a
civilian, will now appoint judicial officers and judge advocates.
Once laid before Parliament it has 120 days
before it becomes a permanent piece of legislation.
So, a resolution has to be passed by each
House of Parliament approving the Order.
|
|
Remedial Orders - procedure, proposal 60 day
period. |
First, a Minister must lay a proposal for a draft remedial order before
Parliament.
The proposal must be accompanied by an explanation of the circumstances
that led to the need for the proposal.
The same 60 day period as for regulatory reform orders applies during
which representations may be made on the order.
Also, during this period, the Joint Committee on Human Rights must report
on whether an order in the same terms as the proposal should be laid. |
|
Draft order another 60 day period. |
At the end of this first sixty day period, the Minister may lay a draft
remedial order.
There is then a further 60 days period after which a motion may be moved
to approve the draft order.
Again, the Joint Committee must report on whether the draft order should
be approved.
Once this order is approved by both Houses the Order may be made and
brought into effect.
|
|
Urgent procedure |
There is also an urgent procedure for remedial orders where the order is
made at the same time as it is laid before Parliament.
|
|
Other Ministerial Orders |
Ministers also create Orders in Council in the guise of delegated
legislation either under an Act or by Royal Prerogative.
|