|
Social background |
|
"Broadly
reflects the community which it serves" |
But:
|
|
Non-white magistrates |
|
|
Conservative |
|
|
Bond & Lemon
(1979) study: |
|
|
What sort of people become magistrates? |
Magistrates come from a wide range of backgrounds and occupations. They
are people with personal integrity and a good knowledge of their local
community.
They also have the ability to listen to all sides of an argument and
contribute to fair and reasonable decisions. They must, of course, be
reliable and have time to give to the requirements of the office.
|
|
Perceptions of magistrates |
|
"Middle-class; middle-aged; middle-minded;
and middle-of-the-road" |
'Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice'
is determined that the social composition of the
magistracy reflects the community it serves, subject to all magistrates
fulfilling the merit criteria for appointment.
It is considered important that magistrates reflect their community by,
for example, representing a dominant industry in the area and reflect the
proportions of minority ethnics.
The social composition includes
-
age
-
gender
-
social class
-
ethnicity
-
political affiliation
|
|
The Auld Report
A Review of the Criminal Courts of England and Wales by Lord Justice
Auld (The Auld Review/Report)
Full text here |
|
JPs are not representative of society.
|
The Auld Report says that
"although the lay magistracy are a sign of
the active engagement of the citizen in the administration of justice,
the distinction between them and District Judges in this and other
respects is diminishing"
They are unrepresentative in age and social class and, in some places, in
ethnicity.
The Auld Report drew on a number of reports notably Morgan and Russell.
|
|
Report of Professor Rod Morgan and Neil Russell, "The judiciary
in the magistrates" courts", published in December 2000
Full report here |
Morgan and Russell’s main findings were that the magistracy is not
wholly representative of the community.
The fact that the magistracy is not a true reflection of the population
nationally or of communities locally is confirmed by a number of studies,
of which the Morgan and Russell research is only the latest. |
|
Problems are derived from recruitment |
The main problem is in the recruitment and the identifying the right pool
of candidates, not in the criteria
for or how they are appointed.
Auld says
urgent steps must be taken to make it less unrepresentative.
|
|
Low expenditure on recruiting |
Although in recent months the MoJ is advertising and promoting the
magistracy, the overall budget on recruiting is low.
|
|
Gender balance |
|
Male/female balanced |
The following table shows that gender is fairly well balanced in the
magistracy, these figures appear in the MoJ annual reports.
|
|
|
1998 |
1998/1999 |
1999/2000 |
2000/2001 |
2001/2002 |
2003/2004 |
|
Men |
816 |
654 |
692 |
703 |
763 |
777 |
|
Women |
793 |
624 |
731 |
633 |
711 |
701 |
|
Total |
1609 |
1278 |
1423 |
1366 |
1474 |
1478 |
|
Gender on appointment: Source MoJ Annual
Report 2004 |
|
|
Ethnicity |
|
Local problems with ethnicity |
The magistracy reflects the population at a national level, that is:
However, there are substantial local variations, particularly the lack of
fit
between local benches and the communities they serve.
This is particularly the case in London where black minority ethnic (BME) communities
are not represented amongst the lay magistracy in anything like the
proportion in which they are found within the general population.
|
|
Ethnicity ratio is improving |
The department of the 'Lord
Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice'
is now correcting this and there has been
a steady annual improvement in recruitment of members of minority ethnics
from 6% to 8.5% since 1995.
|
|
|
1995 |
1996 |
1997 |
1998 |
1998/
1999 |
1999/
2000 |
2000/
2001 |
2001/
2002 |
2002/
2003 |
2003/
2004 |
|
Minority ethnic
appointments as
percentage of total |
6%
|
6.5%
|
6.5%
|
6.5%
|
7.6%
|
8.6%
|
9.3%
|
8.5%
|
8.2%
|
8.5%
|
|
Magistrates' ethnicity on appointment:
Source MoJ Annual Report 2004 |
|
|
Social class |
|
Professional or middle class |
As to status or class, the magistracy is overwhelmingly drawn from
professional and managerial ranks, that is, “disproportionately middle
class, and almost certainly financially well-off, compared to the
population at large” (Auld).
|
|
Age |
|
Dominated by older members |
A
high proportion, about two-fifths, have
retired from full-time work, and this shows up because they can sit more often than those in work. |
|
Youngest JP is 19 |
Lucy Tate JP, a 19-year-old law student was appointed to the Pontefract
bench in 2006, she is the youngest magistrate ever to be appointed.
|
|
82% are over 50 |
|
Age |
|
Under
40 |
40-49 |
50-59 |
60-69 |
|
892 |
3382 |
11477 |
8298 |
|
4.0 |
14.0 |
48.0 |
34.0 |
|
Source MoJ Annual Report 2004 |
|
|
Political affiliation |
|
Lack of evidence of politics |
Although the 'Lord Chancellor and
Secretary of State for Justice'
requires local benches to reflect the
political affiliation of the community they serve (and makes appointments
with that in mind) his assessment is based largely on political turnout at
the most recent election and cannot practically take into account changes
in political affiliation of existing members of local benches.
Not surprisingly, there are no firm indications of the national or local
political balances but the MoJ collects some details of political
affiliation of magistrates. |
|
Political Affiliation |
|
|
|
Con |
Lab |
Lib
Dem |
Pl Cy |
Oth |
Un |
|
8060 |
6082 |
3114 |
131 |
1338 |
5361 |
|
33.5 |
25.3 |
12.8 |
0.5 |
5.6 |
22.3 |
|
Source MoJ Annual Report 2004 |
|
Con = Conservative, Lab = Labour, Lib
Dem = Liberal Democrats, Pl Cy = Plaid Cymru, Oth = Other, Un =
Uncommitted/not known/other |
|
|
Similar people are magistrates |
Morgan and Russell’s findings, if representative of the picture
country-wide, show a worrying picture of the ethnic and social makeup of
benches.
Morgan and Russell have referred to it in relation to social mix:
“If the duties of lay magistrates are
relatively onerous as well as being unpaid, it is not surprising that
the composition of benches consists overwhelmingly of persons with the
time and personal resources to bear that burden”
|
|
Does political affiliation matter? |
Opinions on the politics of the magistracy has changed since the Royal
Commission on Justices of the Peace 1946-48
The report in 1948 thought there should be control of political
parties because the political party selected similar politically minded
applicants for the bench:
"The dominance of members of political
parties has meant that justices have been drawn too narrowly from
certain sections of the community, recommendations for appointment being
made on the ground of good political party record.
"While
there is no reason to think that political partisanship has affected the
decisions of benches, 'political' appointments are to the condemned
because they are not true selections on merit.
"The
proportions of members of committees appointed for their political
affiliations should be restricted and enquiries of party political
headquarters should cease."
However one member disagreed and said that regard to the political
affiliations of a proportion of members should stop. |
|
The modern view |
Members of some extreme organisations disqualify themselves for
appointment, otherwise it is expected that magistrates will try cases on
the evidence and in accordance with their oath, and not allow politics to
influence them. |
|
Possible reforms |
|
4 alternatives for securing a more
representative magistracy |
A
number of alternatives have been suggested for securing a more
representative magistracy:
-
First, to make the role and terms
of service of a magistrate more attractive to and manageable for a wider
range of the community than it is at present, while maintaining its
‘volunteer’ ethos;
-
Second, the introduction of a
system of short-term conscription akin to that of jury service;
-
Third, co-option of citizens “on a
rotating basis, each serving, say, a specified number of sittings for
one year”;
-
Fourth, election, perhaps along the
lines adopted, in the main, at similar levels in the United States.
Any form of conscription would radically change and diminish the strengths
of magistrates.
|
|
Auld prefers making the role of magistrates
more attractive |
The first of the four alternatives is thought to be the way ahead, starting with a
review of how the role and terms of service of a magistrate might be
adapted to attract a wider range of persons than it does at present.
The average number and length of sittings should be a norm, not as a
strait-jacket.
There may be scope for magistrates to sit more or less often, for longer
or shorter periods at a time and more flexibly, according to their
individual circumstances.
|
|
...and some financial reward? |
Lord Justice Auld also believes that, whilst maintaining as far as
possible the essentially voluntary nature of the role, consideration
should be given to providing greater financial assistance than at present
to those who might need it.
|