|
Regulation |
Solicitors Act 1974 and
the Access to
Justice Act 1999 are the main statutory authority for much of the
regulation and supervision of solicitors.
|
|
Clementi Review |
David Clementi undertook a wide-ranging independent review of the
regulation of the legal services market. He submitted his
recommendations at the end of 2004.
Clementi led to the Legal Services Act.
Clementi
review. |
|
The Legal Services Act has received Royal Assent and heralds a
revolution in how legal services will be delivered to the public
. |
The chairman of the Legal Services Board and board members are unlikely to
be appointed until 2008. The Office for Legal Complaints is unlikely to be
empowered to handle complaints until autumn 2010.
Alternative business structures, which allow lawyers to form partnerships
with outside professionals or invite outside investment, is unlikely to be
until at least 2012.
So, the Legal Services Board (LSB) which will regulate the professions,
the independent ombudsman, to deal with consumer complaints and new forms
of legal practice (”Tesco law”) are all still a long way off.
|
|
The Law Society
- the solicitors’ regulating body |
|
Equality and diversity are taken seriously by the Law Society, but there
are still problems
EDR Report |
57% of admissions to the
solicitors roll were women and 18.2% were of minority ethnic origin.
However, these groups remain
significantly under-represented at the senior levels.
An Equal Pay Audit was
undertaken in December 2004. It concluded that there were no significant
pay differentials between men and women and between the various ethnic
groups.
In previous years it was found
that there were significant differentials in pay for women, who earned
less.
|
|
Law Society two parts |
The Law Society has decided to divide into two main parts, one part to
investigate complaints, the other part to be the
‘trade union’ for the solicitors.
The two main parts are
1. The Solicitors Regulation
Authority (until Jan 2007 the Regulation Board) representing interests of solicitors and
2. The
Consumer Complaints Service (CCS) dealing with complaints.
|
|
Solicitors Regulation Authority
|
The Solicitors Regulation
Authority of the Law Society became responsible for all the Law
Society’s regulatory work apart from consumer complaints in January 2007.
The Board operates independently of the Law Society’s Council and was
established to ensure proper separation between the Society’s regulatory
and representative activities.
There are both solicitor and lay members of the Board.
|
|
Why regulation is important |
Solicitors are in a position of trust. They provide advice on matters that
are enormously important to their clients, so it is essential that their
advice is expert, independent, efficient and courteous.
|
|
How the Law Society regulates solicitors |
The functions of the Regulation Authority include:
-
sets the standards for qualifying as a
solicitor.
-
monitors the performance of organisations
that provide legal training.
-
draft the rules of professional conduct,
particularly to make sure they protect the interests of clients.
-
administer the roll (register) of
solicitors.
-
provide information to the public about
solicitors, their work and the standards the public is entitled to
expect.
-
set requirements for solicitors'
continuing professional development.
-
monitor solicitors and their firms to make
sure they are complying with the rules.
-
liaise with the Legal Services Ombudsman,
Legal Services Complaints Commissioner and the Department for
Constitutional Affairs.
-
investigate concerns about solicitors'
standards of practice and compliance with the rules, where necessary
taking regulatory action such as reprimanding the solicitor.
-
run a compensation fund to help people who
have lost money as a result of a solicitor's dishonesty or failure to
account for money they have received.
|
|
Supervision of the Law
Society's handling of complaints |
|
The Legal Services Complaints Commissioner
deals with complaints |
It is known that taken as a whole complaints are not addressed efficiently
and effectively and so to ensure that complaints are treated fairly the
'Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice' appointed the Legal Services Complaints Commissioner
(LSCC) to oversee complaints handling by the
Consumer Complaints Service (CCS).
The Commissioner has the power under
section 52
of the Access to Justice Act 1999 to require the Law Society to
provide information on how it deals with complaints, to make
recommendations about the complaints system, to set targets for complaints
handling, and require the Law Society to submit a plan for improved
complaints handling. In addition, the Commissioner has the power to levy a
penalty on the Law Society if it fails to deliver an adequate plan or
fails in the delivery of that plan.
The Commissioner is the same person who holds the position as Legal
Services Ombudsman (Zahida Manzoor, a woman). |
|
Powers of the LSCC |
The LSCC has the power to levy fines of up to £1 million against the CCS if it fails to comply
with the agreed plans to improve complaints handling.
(The Legal
Services Complaints Commissioner (Maximum Penalty) Order 2004, passed
under the Access to Justice Act 1999).
|
|
Unprecedented fine against Law Society
|
In
May 2006 the Legal Services Complaints Commissioner, Zahida Manzoor fined the
Law Society £250,000, because the society refused to agree that
complainants should receive a letter setting out the main points of their
complaint within two months, rather than three.
However, in July 2006 agreement was reached when the Law Society promised
that consumers would receive a substantive response to their complaint
within 55 days with immediate effect. This was a great
improvement on the Law Society's earlier position, which would have seen
it aim for 58 days by the end of March 2007. In view of their
positive approach, £30,000 was knocked off the original penalty.
Ms Manzoor has two roles: first, as the Legal Services Complaints
Commissioner sets targets and second, as the as Legal Services Ombudsman
has power to levy a fine of up to £1 million.
|
|
Supervision of individual complaints against
solicitors |
|
First, the
solicitor himself. |
Complaints against solicitors are handled in the first instance by
solicitors themselves.
|
|
Second, the CCS |
If people are not satisfied, then they can complain to the
Consumer Complaints Service (CCS)
The CCS deals with complaints about poor
service by solicitors and will check to see whether the solicitor’s bill
is fair and reasonable (but not if the service involves court
proceedings).
It is the reception point for all complaints
from the public, but processes only the 10,000 complaints about
solicitors’ service received annually.
|
|
Compensation can be ordered for distress
and inconvenience |
The Solicitors Act 1974 contains
powers for the Government, in consultation with the Law Society, to set
the Law Society's compensation limits for complainants.
The Law Society's maximum award for compensation for inadequate
professional service was raised from £5,000 to £15,000, with effect from 1
January 2006.
Consumers seeking redress above the £15,000 ceiling have to take their
case to court.
The Solicitors
(Compensation for Inadequate Professional Services) Order 2005 raised the
limit.
Professional misconduct by solicitors
is dealt with by the Law Society’s Compliance Directorate in its role as a
regulator of the solicitors’ profession.
(The CCS replaced the Office for Supervision of Solicitors (OSS) in April
2004).
|
|
Third, the
Legal Services Ombudsman |
Set up under the Courts and Legal Services Act 1990 to deal with cases
where the professions’ own regulatory body did not provide a satisfactory
answer.
The Legal Services Ombudsman is
responsible for overseeing the complaints handling arrangements of five
bodies:
-
the Law Society of England and Wales,
-
the General Council of the Bar,
-
the Institute of Legal Executives,
-
the Council for Licensed Conveyancers and
-
the Chartered Institute of Patent Agents.
The roles of Ombudsman and Complaints Commissioner are distinct - the
Ombudsman is concerned with individual complaints while the Complaints
Commissioner scrutinises the Law Society's complaints handling processes.
The Legal Services Ombudsman is appointed by
the 'Lord Chancellor and Secretary
of State for Justice' in
accordance with Section 21 of the Courts and Legal Services Act 1990. The
Ombudsman cannot be a qualified lawyer and is completely independent of
the legal profession. |
|
Legal Services Ombudsman
Report
(July
2006) |
1701 complaints
were made against solicitors last year and
560
about barristers
The LSO was satisfied with the
way complaints were handled in only 66% of cases.
|
|
Leggatt Report 2001 |
Suggested that the LSO ‘should
be subject to the supervision of the Council on Tribunals’.
|
|
Fourth, Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal |
A complaint can be referred to
the tribunal to discipline a solicitor. It is a statutory body that
deals with serious complaints of professional misconduct.
Members are experienced
solicitors and lay people appointed by the Master of the Rolls. |
|
Fifth, court |
Decisions can be judicially reviewed or subject to ordinary litigation for
the tort of negligence or breach of contract.
|