Bournemouth and

Poole College

Sixth Form Law

Bournemouth and

 Poole College

Text Only

Privacy & cookies

Change Text Size

Sixthform logo

Principles of sentencing - introduction

Sixthform logo

Home | Dictionary | Past papers | Cases | Modules | Exam dates  | National Exam Results | What's new?

Google logo  

Next ]

Introduction

 

Between 2003 and 2004 the activity in court changed: more offences were brought to justice more people were tried however fewer people were sentenced to custody and more anti-social behaviour orders (ASBOs) were ordered. 

 

Over 2 million people (2,037,000) were proceeded against at court in 2004 (around 2,001,000 in 2003) about ¾ of these were dealt with in Magistrate’s courts.

 

Of these around over 61,000 were sentenced to custody 2,293 were made subject to Antisocial behaviour orders (ASBOs).

 

30 percent discount in sentence for early guilty plea

Where a defendant indicates that he wishes to plead guilty he will receive a discount off his sentence of 30 percent. 

 

The idea is to encourage guilty defendants to admit their guilt and avoid the need for a trial.  Trials are expensive and time consuming.  Sometimes a defendant will change his plea just before trial or during the trial, these are known as "cracked trials". 

 

The guilty plea has to be made at the first available opportunity, not at some later stage (R v Wilson, The Times 12 February 2004)
More here

Variations in sentencing

There is a huge variation in the sentences imposed by different courts; for example in Sunderland 36.4% of offenders are discharged compared with 9.2% in Birmingham.  Newspaper report here.

Problems with sentencing

Plea bargaining

There are proposals in the Auld Report on plea bargaining and “sentence indication” first made by the Royal Commission on Criminal Justice in 1993.

 

There is no reference to these proposals in the CJA, but the Attorney-General issued new “Guidelines on the Acceptance of Pleas” in December 2000 and it remains unclear to what extent they are followed in practice.

 

The role of the sentencer

There is clear evidence that of inconsistencies in sentencing between courts both locally and across the UK.  There is a constant tension between the judiciary and the executive with repeated attempts to limit judicial discretion, for example minimum sentences and sentencing guidelines and the creation of the Judicial Studies Board, argued by the executive that it was well overdue. 

 

The government for political as well as to do justice continually changes sentencing policy and sometimes introduces sentences that are simply unworkable, the unit fine scheme was an example.

 

Racism

There is a known to be institutional racism in the police and the CPS, and it is suspected in the judiciary. 

 

There is considerable research suggesting that there is a disproportionate proportion of black and minority ethics (BME) in prison compared with the total population, either because of racism or alternatively because the groups represented commit more crime, or are caught more often (for whatever reason).

 

Sexism

Women make up about 5% of prison numbers (many of them drug couriers).

 

Sentencing of women is inconsistent with sentences for men, this is either due to the “women shouldn’t behave like that” approach or because sentencers do not wish to disrupt family structures that they perceive to be held together by the woman. 

 

Many women are in prison for theft and drugs offences who are arguably receiving an unsuitable punishment.

 

Mentally ill

There are significantly more people with mental illness in prison than in the population at large.

 

Next ]

© 2000-2008 M Souper  Copyright reserved | disclaimer

 Law Weblog | Contact us |

Please visit the FREE Hunger Site