|
The Police and Criminal
Evidence Act 1984 (PACE) |
|
Section 1(2) of the Police And Criminal Evidence Act 1984
|
The main power, used on a daily basis by the police is
contained in
sec 1 of PACE. It allows police officers to stop and
search a person or vehicle for stolen or prohibited articles. The power
can only be exercised if the office has "reasonable grounds" for
suspicion.
This is a nebulous area, but an attempt to
clarify what constitutes "reasonable grounds" can be found in
Code A of the
Codes of
Practice.
|
|
Codes of Practice, Code A |
Details of Code
A are here. |
|
Under sec1 of PACE the police can search for |
Items that the police
can search for under Section 1 of PACE include the stolen
articles and offensive weapons, PACE was amended and the above articles
were added, the amended Act is
shown here.
|
|
Searches for other items |
Other stop and search powers allow the police to search for other items,
these include:
-
Drugs,
Misuse of Drugs Act 1971
-
Contraband, Customs and Excise Management
Act 1979.
-
Alcohol at sporting events,
Sporting Events (Control of Alcohol etc.) Act 1985.
-
Firearms and crossbows, Firearms Act,
Crossbows Act.
|
|
In a nutshell... |
Police can search for:
-
Stolen items
-
Offensive weapons
-
Articles for use in cheat
-
Articles for causing damage
-
Adult fireworks
-
Drugs
-
Firearms
-
Smuggled goods
-
Alcohol (at sporting events)
-
Many environmental articles, and lots
more.
|
|
Public place or ready access |
The
police stop and search power under
PACE is limited to detain and search in
a place to which the public have access, or any other place to which
people have ready access, (but which is not a dwelling), (at the time when
the police officer proposes to exercise the power).
This
does not permit the police officer to enter a dwelling but they may search
a person outside a dwelling.
|
|
Powers of entry under sections 17 & 18 |
If the police wish to search a dwelling or
someone in a dwelling they have to use different powers and are subject to
greater restrictions. |
|
Written record must be made of the search |
Sec
3(1) PACE. When a police officer conducts a search, he must make a written
record of the search unless it is not practicable to do so. Where it is
not practicable to do so, a record must be made 'as soon as is reasonably
practicable after the completion of the search'. |
|
G.O.W.I.S.E. - L.Y. |
Section 2 provides statutory safeguards in relation to PACE and under any
other stop and search power.
Before
searching a person or vehicle or detaining a person or vehicle or person
for the purposes of a search, the officer must take reasonable steps to
bring to the person's attention:-
i) his name;
ii) the name of the police station to which he is attached;
iii) the object of the search; and
iv) his grounds for making the search.
The person must also be informed that he is entitled to a record of the
search and to which police station he should apply to obtain the record
(CODE A para 2.6).
The acronym GOWISE - LY is taught to police
officers to remind them of each requirement:-
[G]rounds for the search
[O]bject of the search
[W]arrant card must be produced if in plain
clothes
[I]dentify, the PC must inform the suspect
of his name
[S]tation, the police station at which the
constable works.
[E]ntitlement to a copy of the search record
[L]egal power being used to for detention.
[Y]ou are being detained for the purpose of
search...suspect must be told he is being detained.
|
|
Human Rights and race relations |
The
Race Relations
(Amendment) Act 2000 makes it unlawful for police officers to
discriminate on the grounds of race, colour, ethnic origin, nationality or
national origins when using their powers.
It should be remembered that the
Metropolitan Police Service
was held to be "institutionally racist" at the
Stephen Lawrence Enquiry.
Although the legislation does not refer to
the Human
Rights Act 1998, the police are required to comply with its
provisions.
Research by the Home Office on a regular
basis indicates that black and minority ethnic (BME) suspects are stopped
and search disproportionately more often than white people. Research
in 2006 shows that this is increasing.
"Black people were seven times
more likely to be stopped and searched under these powers than White
people, ... Asian people were twice as likely to be stopped and searched
than White people ..."
Race and
the criminal justice system 2008 statistics
|
|
Stop and Account |
|
Recommendation 61 of the Stephen Lawrence
Inquiry Report - written records of stops and stops and searches |
Recommendation 61 of the Stephen Lawrence Inquiry Report was launched
in April 2005, Home Office document
here.
Recommendation 61 of the report said that the police must make a
written record of all “stops” and “stops and searches” made under any
legislation. Non-statutory or so called “voluntary” stops must also be
recorded. The record to include the reason for the stop, the outcome, and
the self-defined ethnic identity of the person stopped. A copy of the
record shall be given to the person stopped.
This has raised serious criticism of an
increased bureaucratic burden.
|
|
A police stop is defined by the Home Office
as... |
... “when an officer requests a person in a public place to account for
themselves i.e. their actions, behaviour, presence in an area or
possession of anything, a record of the encounter must be completed at the
time and a copy given to the person who has been questioned, this is
unless there are exceptional circumstances ... a record of an encounter
must always be made when a person requests it, regardless of whether the
officer considers that the criteria set out has been met.”
|
|
Stop and Account and
Stop and Search
|
The long existing power of Stop and Search appears to have been supplement
by a power to Stop and Account. The origins of this procedure and
the above definition is the implementation of Recommendation 61 of the
Stephen Lawrence Enquiry.
There is no legislative framework for requiring a person to 'account' for
themselves.
|
|
The Stop and Search Action Team (SSAT) was launched on 2
July 2004 |
Its main aim is to ensure that the police force use the stop and search
power fairly and as effectively as possible.
Lord Victor Adebowale CBE is the chair of the
Stop and Search Action Team Community Panel.
The Home Office is currently in the process of appointing the members of
the panel community panel. The panel will consist of 20 prominent
representatives from communities throughout the country. The panel’s first
meeting will be in early December.
Among the Community Panels' terms of
reference are: to provide advice to the Stop and Search Action Team (SSAT)
and the delivery board on the race and community impact of the SSAT work
programme; The Stop and Search Action Team Delivery Board, which works
alongside the community panel, provides expert and professional advice to
SSAT, and makes sure that SSAT delivers against its work programme.
More
information about Stop and Search can be found on the Home Office web
site,
here. |